Plaatsman, M. G. A. (2014) Localisation vs. Globalisation - The energy transition and the ostensible paradox between complexity-based planning and global risk. Master thesis.
|
Text
Localisation_vs._Globalisation_1.pdf Download (11MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This research looks at ways of governing the energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables. While the risks of climate change are very much rooted in a global context, there is this postmodernist tendency to prefer decentralised planning approaches. It appears that a paradox is emerging which is about the increasing certainty of climate change and needs of making radical choices to avoid catastrophe vs. post-modernist planning approaches which embrace uncertainty and focus on incrementalism. So how effective are these post-modernist approaches for dealing with the global risks of climate change? Should'nt we make the more radical choices and are such choices even possible?
Item Type: | Thesis (Master) |
---|---|
Degree programme: | Environmental & Infrastructure Planning |
Supervisor: | Zuidema, C. and Woltjer, J. |
Date Deposited: | 23 Apr 2020 05:42 |
Last Modified: | 23 Apr 2020 05:42 |
URI: | https://frw.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/2694 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |