Javascript must be enabled for the correct page display

Localisation vs. Globalisation - The energy transition and the ostensible paradox between complexity-based planning and global risk

Plaatsman, M. G. A. (2014) Localisation vs. Globalisation - The energy transition and the ostensible paradox between complexity-based planning and global risk. Master thesis.

[img]
Preview
Text
Localisation_vs._Globalisation_1.pdf

Download (11MB) | Preview

Abstract

This research looks at ways of governing the energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables. While the risks of climate change are very much rooted in a global context, there is this postmodernist tendency to prefer decentralised planning approaches. It appears that a paradox is emerging which is about the increasing certainty of climate change and needs of making radical choices to avoid catastrophe vs. post-modernist planning approaches which embrace uncertainty and focus on incrementalism. So how effective are these post-modernist approaches for dealing with the global risks of climate change? Should'nt we make the more radical choices and are such choices even possible?

Item Type: Thesis (Master)
Degree programme: Environmental & Infrastructure Planning
Supervisor: Zuidema, C. and Woltjer, J.
Date Deposited: 23 Apr 2020 05:42
Last Modified: 23 Apr 2020 05:42
URI: https://frw.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/2694

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item