Javascript must be enabled for the correct page display

(Anti-)vaccination reasoning among Dutch Christian families

Mud, N. (2020) (Anti-)vaccination reasoning among Dutch Christian families. Master thesis.

[img]
Preview
Text
Master's Thesis_Nienke Mud_2555956 (1).pdf

Download (730kB) | Preview

Abstract

Since the early 2000s, vaccination rates in the Netherlands have declined. If this decline continues, herd immunity can be threatened and eventually benefits will get lost: viruses can circulate freely and risks will multiply. This decline in vaccinations is due to several reasons of which religion is one. For instance, the Bible Belt, an area in the Netherlands where a lot of orthodox protestants are living, has experienced epidemics of vaccine preventable diseases. The main goal of this thesis is to get a clearer understanding of (anti-)vaccination reasoning among Dutch Christian families and how their religion plays a role. Cultural schema theory and the life course approach are used in order to understand the motivations behind their reasoning. During the life course, people undergo (personal) experiences that shape their cultural schemas. The way cultural schemas are internalised, depends on the experiences of individuals. On the other hand, existing schemas also cause experiences to be perceived in a certain way and this may strengthen their schemas. Ten in-depth interviews with thirteen adults were conducted in order to understand their reasoning. Most of these interviews were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some took place online and some at the home of the participants. Grounded theory was used to understand the reasoning of the participants. Reading the verbatim transcripts carefully, enabled me to understand the worlds of the participants which were described in their own words. This way, theory was developed by reading the data. Next to this inductive approach, during the analysis of the transcript, there seemed to be an interplay between induction and deduction. The findings show that broadly four different positions regarding vaccination could be distinguished. Firstly, an anti-vaccination position. These participants believe in God’s divine providence and described that their religion plays the main role in their anti-vaccination reasoning. Secondly, an anti-vaccination position with a different reasoning. These participants talked about the necessity and the risks of vaccination and also see their body as a temple. Their faith and medical reasons played a great role in their anti-vaccination reasoning. Participants who believe in the knowledge of doctors and see vaccines as a gift from God were provaccination. The last position is a sceptical point-of-view. These participants were afraid of the risks of vaccinations but also acknowledge the importance of public health. The (anti-)vaccination reasoning of the participants is supported by the cultural schemas faith, respect, critical thinking and individual liberty. However, the four positions are the result of different internalization of these cultural schemas through (personal) experiences during the upbringing of the participants, their time as young parents and contemporary society. To conclude, the (anti-)vaccination reasoning is context-dependent and therefore something intensely personal. The participant’s narratives also showed that different denominations within Christianity have different interpretations of faith, and that it is not possible to measure every Christian by the same standards. Some participants feel that the societal pressure to vaccinate violates their individual liberty and bodily autonomy. The findings of this research can inform policy makers how to better respond to Christian families and their(anti-)vaccination reasoning, also in relation to the COVID-19 vaccine. This research focussed on Christianity in general. Future research can focus on a particular denomination of Christianity. This way, more in-depth information about one specific denomination can be obtained.

Item Type: Thesis (Master)
Degree programme: Population Studies
Supervisor: Haas, B. de
Date Deposited: 27 Jan 2021 12:37
Last Modified: 27 Jan 2021 12:37
URI: https://frw.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/3400

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item