@unpublished{theses_frw3568,
           title = {The impact of changing rules-in-use on seizing a joint investment opportunity: a Combiplan Nijverdal case study.},
            year = {2021},
          author = {Jur Heerink},
             url = {https://frw.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/3568/},
        abstract = {The influence of rules-in-use can be indicated by determining the rule state of a certain rule category. These rule states can indicate a positive or a negative influence on seizing a joint investment opportunity (JIO). A case study of two time periods withing the Combiplan Nijverdal project have been conducted in order to assess the impact of rules-in-use on the seizing of a JIO. Rule state changes of three rule categories were found to have had a positive influence on the seizing of Combiplan Nijverdal. One rule state was found to have shifted towards a less negative influence. Individually these rules-in-use are not able to impact the seizing, only combined is there an impact on seizing the JIO. Rules-in-use of three rule categories were found to not have had an impact in the seizing of the JIO in Nijverdal.}
}