<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "Art In Public Space: A Planning Tool For Urban Liveability"^^ . "This study is aimed at the connection between art in public space (APS) and urban liveability and\r\nprovides conditions of using APS strategically as a planning tool. Urban liveability, defined as subjective \r\nwell-being, is a product of both physical- and perceived neighbourhood characteristics and is measured \r\nwith the cognitive indicator of urban satisfaction and the affective indicator of urban happiness \r\n(Mouratidis & Yiannakou, 2022). According to Nursey-Brey (2020) APS has the potential to be used \r\nstrategically within placemaking, due to its potential positive connection with urban liveability. \r\nPrevious studies including the relationship between APS, urban liveability and planning emphasized \r\nthe importance of a bottom-up implementation approach (Markusen & Gadwa, 2010). However, \r\nfurther conditions of APS as a planning tool for improving urban liveability need to be identified. This \r\nstudy is focussed on the question: In what way can urban liveability benefit from art in public space? \r\nThrough an in-depth case study of the Korrewegwijk in Groningen, and a comparison with Kreuzberg \r\nin Berlin this relationship is explored. The study used mixed methods, which include semi-structured \r\ninterviews with experts, as well with residents and observation in both research areas. The data \r\nindicate that APS has a positive influence on urban happiness and -satisfaction and consequentially on \r\nurban liveability. This results from the positive impact of APS on the perceived neighbourhood \r\ncharacteristics of social cohesion, place attachment and identity. However, the influence of APS \r\ndepends on the implementation framework in which a bottom-up approach is preferred. After all, not \r\nthe product, but the process of creating APS is key in a positive impact on urban liveability. \r\nFurthermore, this study identified political and institutional barriers that have to be overcome in order \r\nto use APS as a planning tool. Understanding the relationship between APS and urban liveability as \r\nwell as the implementation process is relevant in shaping liveable cities"^^ . "2022" . . . . . . . "Aaron Noah"^^ . "Migchels"^^ . "Aaron Noah Migchels"^^ . . . . . . "Art In Public Space: A Planning Tool For Urban Liveability (Text)"^^ . . . "Bachelor Thesis Aaron Migchels .pdf"^^ . . . "Art In Public Space: A Planning Tool For Urban Liveability (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "indexcodes.txt"^^ . . . "Art In Public Space: A Planning Tool For Urban Liveability (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . . "Art In Public Space: A Planning Tool For Urban Liveability (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "Art In Public Space: A Planning Tool For Urban Liveability (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "Art In Public Space: A Planning Tool For Urban Liveability (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . "HTML Summary of #4033 \n\nArt In Public Space: A Planning Tool For Urban Liveability\n\n" . "text/html" . .