@unpublished{theses_frw4375,
            year = {2023},
          author = {Hasna Mutia Sadewo},
           title = {Institutional Grammar, Requirements, and Monitoring for Low-Income Housing Program:  A Comparative Study of Indonesia?s FLPP and California?s LIHTC},
             url = {https://frw.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/4375/},
        abstract = {This research presents a comparative qualitative study of low-income housing programs, comparing 
Indonesia?s Facility of Liquidity for Housing Financing Program (FLPP) with California?s Low Income 
Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC). The research examines the influence of policy design including 
requirements and monitoring on location and quality of low-income housing as a gap in the existing 
literature by employing policy document design and content analysis. In terms of the process structure, 
FLPP is considered more susceptible to principal-agent problems, such as inefficient and poor delivery 
of projects, than LIHTC. The application of the institutional grammar tool reveals that LIHTC?s policy 
documents are better balanced and feature more restrictive statements compared to FLPP?s. As expected, 
FLPP?s location and quality requirements lack specificity, frequently referring to general polices, and 
its monitoring system is less rigorous than LIHTC?s. Despite LIHTC?s higher complexity and cost, its 
robust requirements and montiroing offer valuable insights for enhancing FLPP?s effectiveness in 
addressing location and quality challenges. This study reveals that well-designed policies are less likely 
to suffer from inadequate low-income housing location and quality of low-income, highlighting the 
significance of policy deisgn in resolving these issues. Thus, the research emphasizes the importance of 
paying attention to policy design when tackling low-income housing location and quality concerns.}
}